Democratic Party drops the ball on the meaning of Fair Reflection.

I was looking in the democratic party bylaws for the definition of Fair Reflection. The democratic party definition of "fair reflection" seems to define everybody by how they were born, and not by how they live their lives. This is a really big deal, and offensive as well.

It appears the democratic party judges you by the color of your skin, not by the ethics and character you develop or already possess.

Imagine the statement, "that person is scarred for life". If someone is told they have been scarred for life, might that not be as debilitating as whatever act it was that originally caused the "alleged" scarring for life? The democratic party defines fair reflection as fairly reflecting all races, ethnicities and both sexes, but it says nothing about fairly reflecting those whose daily responsibilities to their family, relatives and community consumes every waking hour and leave them vulnerable from lack of free time.

A democratic voter could be the laziest, manipulative, narcissistically driven person, but if they fall within a fair reflection category, it just doesn't matter if another person is being forgotten even if they are impoverished and still impart goodwill and responsible actions upon the planet.

This is very disconcerting to me. You could be the most responsible, caring, community driven person alive, and not qualify for fair reflection within the democratic party. This is just an outrage and explains a lot about the ethically bankrupt higher ups in the democratic party.