FAIR-REFLECTION.COM

Democratic Party drops the ball on the meaning of Fair Reflection.

2010-12-27T20:25:00.000-08:00

I was looking in the democratic party bylaws for the definition of Fair Reflection. The democratic party definition of "fair reflection" seems to define everybody by how they were born, and not by how they live their lives. This is a really big deal, and offensive as well.

It appears the democratic party judges you by the color of your skin, not by the ethics and character you develop or already possess.

Imagine the statement, "that person is scarred for life". If someone is told they have been scarred for life, might that not be as debilitating as whatever act it was that originally caused the "alleged" scarring for life? The democratic party defines fair reflection as fairly reflecting all races, ethnicities and both sexes, but it says nothing about fairly reflecting those whose daily responsibilities to their family, relatives and community consumes every waking hour and leave them vulnerable from lack of free time.

A democratic voter could be the laziest, manipulative, narcissistically driven person, but if they fall within a fair reflection category, it just doesn't matter if another person is being forgotten even if they are impoverished and still impart goodwill and responsible actions upon the planet.

This is very disconcerting to me. You could be the most responsible, caring, community driven person alive, and not qualify for fair reflection within the democratic party. This is just an outrage and explains a lot about the ethically bankrupt higher ups in the democratic party.

Ohio Voters sue for the right to have Fair Reflection.

2010-09-18T13:35:00.000-07:00

Four Ohio residents have asked their own state to fairly reflect the will of the voters by requring vote by mail costs be the same in each and every Ohio county. The irony is the term fair reflection never came up in the article even though that is what these four residents are basically asking for.

This is a very important case that could have national voting implications. Click here to read all about it.

In 2008 lawsuits were filed in Nevada over how the caucuses were being run. The judge in the case basically held the position that even if the democratic caucuses were being unfairly run (and they apparently were favoring Barack Obama in an unfair manner), it was not up to a judge to fix the problem, but rather the democratic party!

The judges thinking makes sense. If the democratic party is that fouled up, it's not up to a judge to make the democratic party run fairer contests, instead, people can choose to vote another party.

However, in this instance, the lawsuit relates to ALL VOTERS, and so a judge may see the necessity in stepping in and making the ease of mail by voting be the SAME for all voters irrespective of which county they live in.

We Will Not Be Silenced Documentary Gets New Life on Fox News.

2010-07-11T17:44:00.001-07:00

HillBuzz has devoted an article to the documentary "We Will not Be Silenced" which is helping to chronicle the cheating and thuggish tactics that went on during the 2008 democratic election process along with the presidential contest as well.

Here is another HillBuzz article about We Will Not Be Silenced. STRATEGY: Commit to 30 Days of pressuring the DNC and American Media to answer the question “Why was voter fraud and intimidation allowed to run rampant in 2008?”

And there is this thread on HillBuzz article about We Will Not Be Silenced.

Help keep this thread on GretaWire to the front so more people can learn about We Will Not Be Silenced

You can also see the latest youtube video of the Fox and Friends appearance here.

I wanted to contribute to the article but for some reason my comments don't seem to get through however don't let that deter you from contributing any bad experiences you had during the 2008 elections.

Barack Obama may not be a Natural Born Citizen.

2009-01-04T13:12:00.000-08:00

According to wikipedia, the constitution is vague on what is meant by "natural born". The truth may lie in finding what the original founding members meant by "natural born" by investigating their writings in other books and newspaper articles written prior to and around the time that the constitution was written.

It is quite possible that what the founding constitutional members were concerned with was English aristocracy coming to the United States to have a kid so that that kid could one day be president.

Therefore, Natural born citizen as defined over 200 years ago probably refers to two actual US citizens living on US soil who have a child on US soil would allow the child to be called "natural born".

Because the early days of the U.S were almost entirely slanted towards the male point of view, I think a compromise position to the natural born rule was allowed. If the male was a citizen of the United States, and lived on US soil, and the birth mother lived in the United States but was NOT a U.S. citizen, the child would be still be considered natural born because of the status of the FATHER, not the mother.

Isn't it ironic how after all the sexism allegations that have been leveled against the Barack Obama campaign that they must now cling to "mummy is a US citizen" as justification for Barack Obama being a natural born citizen.

If the FATHER was NOT a US citizen, and the birth mother was, that would NOT be considered natural born, because 233 years ago the man was considered the primary wage earner of the family, and for the son or daughter to be considered naturally born, the father would need to be an american citizen, otherwise British Aristocracy could impregnate american women citizens and hold future influence over their "naturlized american son" even if their own allegiances were still to Great Britain.

Let us examine a very important challenge to Chester Arthur's run for vice presidency, from wikipedia, natural born citizen Chester A. Arthur (1829-1886), 21st president of the United States, might have been born in Canada.[21]

This was never demonstrated by his political opponents, although they raised the objection during his vice-presidential campaign. He was born to a U.S.-citizen mother and a father from Ireland who was eventually naturalized as a U.S. citizen. Arthur was sworn in as president when President Garfield died after being shot.

There is the proof. Arthur's VP candidacy was challenged even though his mother was a US citizen! Even though there were allegations Arthur was born in Canada, It wasn't until his FATHER became a US citizen that the controversy subsided. I don't know when Chester Arthur's father became a US citizen, but it apparently was before Chester Arthur became president.

One could argue that the above viewpoint is now outdated and sexist, and that probably is accurate. However, the spirit of the natural born citizen clause was that anyone who can become president of the United States needs to have familial roots on US soil, familial roots being defined as the parents living on US soil, the father most likely a wage earner, and you know, as they say on the Barack Obama side, "bro's before ho's. Mama's standing just wasn't the thing back then.

Barack Obama is a naturalized citizen, but he is not a natural born citizen. However, both of his daughters are natural born citizens because Barack Obama IS a naturalized citizen of the United States. If Barack Obama's father had never became a United States citizen, then Barack Obama would not be a natural born citizen. Barack Obama would however be, a naturalized citizen of the United States, but not eligible to be president.

However, Barack Obama's father RUINED his own citizenship a couple of different ways. This is the part of the story that nobody talks about. Barack Obama broke a morals clause, and later on became a political figure in Kenya, BOTH of these actions would INVALIDATE Barack Obama's standing as a citizen of the United States. If Barack Obama's father is not a citizen of the United States, than Barack Obama cannot be a natural born citizen.

The most effective way to have this issue be decided in Barack Obama's favor is to show other examples of past presidents whose fathers were never US citizens, or lost their citizenship before their son tried running for president. If there are no examples, then Barack Obama's presidency is actually breaking constitutional law.

If there are past presidents that had fathers who never became american citizens and therefore have already broken this specific constitutional law, and no challenges were filed, then Barack Obama would possibly have an out by arguing that you can't just pick and choose who the natural born citizen rule is applied to, it either applies to all presidents, or to none.

If there are no other presidents whose father was from another country AND never became a US citizen, and if it is true that Barack Obama's father never REMAINED a US citizen, then Barack Obama should not be eligible to become president of the United States until a change in the constitution would make him eligible for future presidential races, because the law cannot be backdated.

Besides violating the morals clause for incoming immigrants by having an affair, Barack Obama's father became a Kenyan political consultant later on in life, and that is SPECIFICALLY unacceptable for that persons son laying claim to being natural born.

For you Barack Obama supporters who love to ridicule the whole natural born citizenship issue, it was your guy who has used every loophole imaginable to get ahead in his political career, so don't be so quick to presume the chosen one is above the very system he has used to defeat his rivals. Remember, "bro's before ho's" also counts in the natural born citizen debate and if Barack Obama's father never became and REMAINED a US citizen, Barack Obama cannot be a natural born citizen.

FCC FINES CABLE NEWS COMPANY FOR FRAUD, the CABLE BARRIER HAS BEEN BROKEN.

2008-12-04T10:06:00.001-08:00

Here is the link to FCC FINES CABLE NEWS PROGRAM FOR FAKE NEWS. I think this is confirmation that MSNBC CAN BE FINED for SPEWING their own agenda and news opinion as FACT. Please not the date, September of 2007.

Playing with Numbers in the 2008 Presidential Election.

2008-11-12T11:35:00.000-08:00

Playing with numbers...

The Mainstream medias assault on Sarah Palin cost the Republican party 2.5 million voters who switched, for a 5 million vote swing.

John McCain was portrayed as too old even though his 96 year old mother accompanied McCain on the campaign trail and could kick the butt of many of the pundits who said John McCain was too old. Loss of another 2.5 million voters for another 5 million voter swing.

Barack Obama accepting over 200 million dollars in undocumented donations, another 2.5 million voters affected, for another 5 million vote swing.

The media used the above results to create an illusion that it was McCain who was desperate, another 2.5 million voters lost, another 5 million vote swing.

Bill and Hillary Clinton encouraging voters to vote for Barack Obama, another 2.5 million voters, for a swing of 5 million.

In terms of raw numbers it would be too simplistic to say that the above total cost John McCain 25 million votes. It is likely that more than one of the above affected the same voter. So even though there was a potential 25 million vote swing, I would say that average voter probably was affected by 3 of the 5 big reasons given above. So subtracting 15 million from the above we get a potential 10 million swing in voters if none of the big five had happened up above.

This years race would have been a virtual tie if Bill and Hillary Clinton had not been involved, and if Bill and Hillary Clinton had jumped ship over to McCain's side, they might have made enough of a difference to swing the race to John McCain, although they would have create a scenario in which both sides of the political landscape at one time either loved them, or hated them.

I wonder how many will respect the Clintons.

What is Fair Reflection?

2008-11-03T12:39:00.001-08:00

Fair Reflection is a democratic tenet in which each state's population must be fairly accounted in the voting process. The purpose of Fair Reflection is to not ignore any democratic group. Fair Reflection is a tenet that was urinated on this year, and we can thank George Soros, David Axelrod, Barack Obama and democratic party Higher ups for that.

If you lived in a caucus state and work a swing shift or two jobs, or are elderly, retired, the head of a household that can't take supper time off and spend the night voting, or a single parent, the democratic party basically took your vote away. All these groups were passed over in the caucus states by the democratic party, I consider it a crime to use fair reflection in democratic bylaws, but then not practice them in reality, it certainly is bait and switch.

YOUTUBE VIDEO, I AM am a HILLARY CLINTON SUPPORTING and I APPROVED THIS MESSAGE, is now on GOOGLE VIDEO also!

2008-10-31T21:25:00.000-07:00

I AM am a HILLARY CLINTON SUPPORTER and I APPROVED this message. Please share this video if you know a Hillary Clinton voter that is still on the fence.

I am a Hillary Clinton Supporter, and I APPROVED this Message.

2008-10-28T23:02:00.000-07:00

MSNBC Daily Promos, unethical by FCC standards, it sure looks like it to me.

2008-10-27T08:53:00.000-07:00

The daily MSNBC promos they they run all day long, in my opinion, are out of bounds of fairness.

Here is the transcript of the one running today, Oct. 27, 2008.

Voice over says, "Tonight, It's the final stretch, and it's getting ugly," (cut away to Chris Matthews on camera sound bite " Two Strongest emotions in politics are, JEALOUSLY, and FEAR" (back to voiceover) As McCain's ad go even more negative, can they turn the tide in his favor, or will voters swing the other direction? (Back to Chris Matthews on camera sound bite) "Here's my Theory", (Back to Voiceover) Hardball with Chris Matthews, tonight at 7 on MSNBC.

This is absolutely outrageous, for a news channel to actually state their opinion as a fact that John McCain's ads are "going more negative"...

These MSNBC news hacks know better. This is definitely worth a report to the FCC. You have the text up above, I checked and rechecked it for accuracy. It is the Chris Matthews Hardball Promo for Oct. 27, 2008 on MSNBC. The complaint is MSNBC stating their opinion as if it is a fact.

How to Report MSNBC News when they Violate FCC LAW.

2008-10-23T00:45:00.000-07:00

Edit Note, I found the following information at the beginning of Dec, 2008, SEVERAL MONTHS after I postulated this article. Here is that info that backs up the rest of this article. Here is the link to FCC FINES CABLE NEWS PROGRAM FOR FAKE NEWS.
I think this is confirmation that MSNBC CAN BE FINED for SPEWING their own agenda and news opinion as FACT. Please not the date, September of 2007.Here are some examples of Possible FCC violations being committed by MSNBC on a daily basis. (End of Edit Note).---------------------------------------------------------

MSNBC Polling analyst, Chuck Todd, may say, "John McCain has given up in Michigan and moved his operations out of the state to solidify other locales that normally are solidly Republican". This one sentence is mind boggling damaging to the McCain campaign, primarily because it is opinion being reported as fact.

The implication being made is that John McCain can't retreat fast enough from Michigan and is running out of time, and places to campaign. This type of statement is so full of distortion and wrought with gloom and doom, but it is being sold as FACT, when it is not fact, it is merely Todd's OPINION.

If MSNBC were being objective rather than simply moving an agenda forward to elect Barack Obama, they could just as easily have reported that McCain's strategy was to move his operations to as many toss up states as soon as possible so that if those states tip his way and get reported as such, it may invigorate the other states that are 5-10 points down in the polls to move closer towards McCain, which in turn creates excitement and increased momentum...

Do you see how my opinion is just as valid as Chuck Todds? That is why both positions are opinions, and not facts. Completely opposite interpretations can be made from the same observation. But when Chuck Todd, or any other news anchor on MSNBC reports on McCain leaving Michigan, they make it sound like McCain is fleeing the state, losing ground, running out of options, giving up, etc.

That is MSNBC's OPINION, it is not fact. However, because MSNBC broadcasts 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, their "opinion" becomes reality.

Another example. MSNBC has been reporting on an almost hourly basis about how unpopular Sarah Palin is in the polls, MSNBC further is reporting that Sarah Palin is dragging down John McCain. Yet just a few days ago MSNBC was crowing about how Pennsylvania was in the bag for Barack Obama. So what happens? Sarah Palin shows up to campaign in Pennsylvania and suddenly within a day or two there are secret talks in Obama's camp that Obama is actually only up by two points in Pennsylvania!

If Sarah Palin is so unpopular and hurting McCain's cause as MSNBC keeps reporting, then how does her appearance in Pennsylvania result in Barack Obama's lead shrinking? Answer, MSNBC is once again trying to spout off their opinion as FACT, when it is just an OPINION. However, the continued attacks on Sarah Palin by MSNBC DO WORK, and the result is not as close as the two points that was "leaked" to MSNBC from the Obama camp.

The other thing MSNBC does is the "damned no matter what they do" attack method. When John McCain wanted to suspend his campaign to deal with the bailout bill, MSNBC first claimed that John McCain was suspending his campaign to avoid debating Barack Obama. When McCain went to Washington, MSNBC clobbered John McCain as being ineffective and inept and contributing nothing to the bailout bill vote. To make matters even worse, MSNBC immediately took the position that the bailout bill MUST BE PASSED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, and all of their reporting was based on this presumption. Considering that phone calls to congress were running 20-1 AGAINST the bailout bill, not rushing the bill made the most sense, and was completely counter to MSNBC's position.

As time passes, it becomes obvious that MSNBC attempted to help the original bailout bills pass while using the non passage to attack John McCain for wanting to postpone the first presidential debate and deal with the bailout bill. MSNBC's politicization of this entire incident may go down as one of the most egregious, narcissistic, agenda driven media coups ever attempted, and frankly, an investigation needs to be done. Did MSNBC commit either fraud or treason in their coverage of the first two bailout bill votes? If you have access to the original MSNBC Bailout Bill coverage, you will be shocked to see how they politicized the situation to benefit Barack Obama and attack John McCain.

MSNBC used the opinion that the bailout bill MUST BE PASSED and based all of their reporting on this opinion.

Once the Bailout Bill did not pass on the first vote, MSNBC then dragged McCain through the mud claiming that he had no ability to gather yes votes, and in essence did nothing in Washington while he was there. Then, Chris Matthews stated that McCain had no backbone because McCain backed down from his suspending his campaign position and found time for the second debate. The "damned no matter what McCain did ploy" by MSNBC was in play, and it was disgusting to see MSNBC do it.

Another example of the "Damned no matter what they do approach" involves Sarah Palin's wardrobe. It's been gleefully revealed by MSNBC that Sarah Palin's wardrobes are expensive. But lets think about this for a moment. MSNBC has attacked Sarah Palin mercilessly for being an outsider, imagine how much more brutal they would have been if Sarah Palin didn't look so classy during her campaigning. Isn't it possible that MSNBC would have hired a fashion consultant to bury Sarah Palin on national television for dressing like a country bumpkin?

Once again, MSNBC has set up a scenario where no matter how Sarah Palin dresses, they will ridicule her choices, either she is a fashion unconscious small town girl, or she is overspending on her wardrobe and therefore has shown bad judgement.

In my opinion MSNBC is running a news scam, concocting opinion generated news to fit their own agenda and I sincerely hope somebody will make it their job to sue MSNBC, and do it quickly.

Is MSNBC OPINION GENERATED NEWS, NEWS you CANNOT TRUST? HOW to REPORT MSNBC NEWS when they VIOLATE FCC LAW.

2008-10-22T19:15:00.000-07:00

Here are some examples of Possible Fraud being committed by MSNBC.

MSNBC Polling analyst, Chuck Todd, may say, "John McCain has given up in Michigan and moved his operations out of the state to solidify other locales that normally are solidly Republican". This one sentence is mind boggling damaging to the McCain campaign, primarily because it is opinion being reported as fact.

The implication being made is that John McCain can't retreat fast enough from Michigan and is running out of time, and places to campaign. This type of statement is so full of distortion and wrought with gloom and doom, but it is being sold as FACT, when it is not fact, it is OPINION.

If MSNBC were being fair, they could just as easily have reported that McCain's strategy is to move his operations to as many toss up states as soon as possible so that if those states tip his way and gets reported as such, it may invigorate the other states that may be 5-10 points down in the polls to move closer to him, which in turn creates excitement and increased momentum...

Do you see how my opinion is just as valid as Chuck Todds? That is why both positions are opinions, and not facts. Completely opposite interpretations can be made from the same observation. But when Chuck Todd, or any other news anchor on MSNBC reports on McCain leaving Michigan, they make it sound like McCain is fleeing the state, losing ground, giving up, etc.

That is MSNBC's OPINION, it is not fact.

Another example. MSNBC has been reporting on an almost hourly basis about how unpopular Sarah Palin is in the polls, MSNBC further is reporting that Sarah Palin is dragging down John McCain. Yet just a few days ago MSNBC was crowing about how Pennsylvania was in the bag for Barack Obama. So what happens? Sarah Palin shows up to campaign in Pennsylvania and suddenly within a day or two there are secret talks in Obama's camp that Obama is actually only up by two points in Pennsylvania!

If Sarah Palin is so unpopular and hurting McCain's cause as MSNBC keeps reporting, then how does her appearance in Pennsylvania result in Barack Obama's lead shrinking? Answer, MSNBC is once again trying to spout off their opinion as FACT, when it is just an OPINION.

The other thing MSNBC does is the "damned no matter what they do" attack method. When John McCain wanted to suspend his campaign to deal with the bailout bill, MSNBC first claimed that John McCain was suspending his campaign it to avoid debating Barack Obama. Then MSNBC clobbered John McCain as being ineffective in his trip to Washington. To make matters even worse, MSNBC immediately took the position that the bailout bill MUST BE PASSED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, and all of their reporting was based on this presumption. Considering that phone calls to congress were running 20-1 AGAINST the bailout bill, not rushing the bill made the most sense, and was completely counter to MSNBC's position.

However MSNBC continued to report the news based on a their own agenda driven premise that the bailout bill MUST be immediately passed. Once the Bailout Bill did not pass on the first vote, MSNBC then dragged McCain through the mud claiming that he had no ability to gather yes votes, and in essence did nothing in Washington while he was there. Then, Chris Matthews stated that McCain had no backbone because he backed down and found time for the second debate. The damned no matter what McCain did ploy by MSNBC, and it was disgusting to see MSNBC do it.

Another example of the "Damned no matter what they do approach" involves Sarah Palin's wardrobe. It's been gleefully revealed by MSNBC that Sarah Palin's wardrobes are expensive. But lets think about this for a moment. MSNBC has attacked Sarah Palin mercilessly for being an outsider, imagine how much more brutal they would have been if Sarah Palin didn't look so classy during her campaigning. Isn't it possible that MSNBC would have hired a fashion consultant to just bury Sarah Palin on national television for dressing like a country bumpkin?

Once again, MSNBC has set up a scenario where no matter how Sarah Palin dresses, they will ridicule her choices, either she is a fashion unconscious small town girl, or she is overspending on her wardrobe and therefore has shown bad judgement.

In my opinion MSNBC is running a news scam, concocting opinion generated news to fit their own agenda and I sincerely hope somebody will make it their job to sue this station, and do it quickly.

Sarah Silverman doesn't realize how Stupid her Go to Florida Schtick really is.

2008-10-16T14:54:00.001-07:00

I think there needs to be a You Tube viral response to Sarah Silverman's Go to Florida campaign. Silverman is so out it, she really doesn't get how evil her message really is. I'm not even going to put a link to the video it is so disgusting.

Suffice it to say it's go to Florida and tell grandma and grandpa to vote for Barack Obama, otherwise don't visit them. Narcissism is wasted on the young.

Why Isn't Pastor Wright Defending Sarah Palin?

2008-10-03T15:16:00.000-07:00

I think it is very easy to be prejudiced against people from Alaska. If you are a true Alaskan, you learn your survival skills early on, or you don't survive.

The rest of us who live in more temperate regions can't fathom what it must be like to live in Alaska. The Northern Great Plains states have tough winters as well, but they also have their summers.

My point is I've been enlightened by Pastor Wright and his sermon on how white America can accept John F Kennedy's accent, but not accept a black persons accent and instead will mock it, (although white people do mock New Yawkers and so on, sorry to discredit you, Pastor Wright).

But where is Pastor Wright now that we need him to defend Sarah Palin and where she comes from? Where is the Reverend Wright to explain to us how the Alaska environment might refocus a person's learning curve to one of survival, which in turn might make it look like such a person is less knowledgeable on certain topics, especially to media snobs such as Olberman and media wanna be snob Maddow.

It is clear that Palin is a smart bird who can learn more in a minute then others will learn in an hour, too bad the smug political left will ignore the truth and attempt to tarnish the second coming of Barack Obama, also known as Sarah Palin.

Barack Obama Ongoing Campaign Shenanigans, Plus Check out the "We Will Not Be Silenced Barack Obama Documentary.

2008-09-11T00:06:00.000-07:00

For a really terrific article on Barack Obama's past campaign shenanigans, check out Barack Obama's election history hoisted by his own petard.

You can also check out the documentary video We Will Not Be Silenced. Preview portions of the video at We Will Not Be Silenced Preview Video

You can also check out caucusconfession.com FAIR-REFLECTION.com HILLARY-WINS.com

When you click on these links there are easy to use search boxes on the top left of each blog. Just type in the words you are interested in all the topics that have that word should show up.

Never Forget the Media Bias in the 2008 democratic election against Hillary Clinton.

2008-08-24T23:51:00.000-07:00

This is just a brief recap of the tip of the huge iceberg of media bias against Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton. Huffington Post basically assaulted the Clinton's on almost a daily basis, and MSNBC, CNN, Time and Newsweek all chipped in. Reason? Try the amount of media buys the Barack Obama side made. By spending double and triple what Hillary Clinton was able to spend in advertising, it appears that Barack Obama won the hearts and pocket books of the media.

Keith (I can't believe I used to like that guy) Olbermann, looking right into the camera and delivering one of the all time bodacious lies ever committed by a "newscaster".
Dan Abrams floating the idea that the super delegates should not determine the outcome of the democratic race. Lol, but a tiny minority of voters in the caucus contests are more qualified???
CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE. The above Huffington post headline is a pretty horrible example, even by Huffington Post "standards".
Click on Image to Enlarge.

Huffington Post helps ambush Hillary Clinton with the "inevitability" headline. This is the newest and most toxic form of news creating pre predicting reality that I can ever recall. It so lowers the bar for what good journalism is that I wonder if these types of media outlets should even be called news.

What if the headline had been "Hillary Clinton may see a spike in pledged delegates if she continues winning over the final 10 weeks of the campaign". Do you see how easy it would have been to swing the nomination to Hillary Clinton?
LOL, the Colorado Caucus is "too close to call" even though Barack Obama would win by a 2-1 margin. Yep, those caucus contests fairly reflect the popularity of each candidate (sarcasm alert).

Click on Image to Enlarge "The Joker" name Jay Leno.

The Democratic Party MUST RENOUNCE their claim to "Fair Reflection" or they will continue to lose voters this year.

2008-08-24T22:43:00.000-07:00

If the Democratic Party will at least admit that they did not Fairly Reflect (aka Represent) the voters of Great Plains Caucus States, I would actually consider voting democratic this fall. I definitely cannot vote for my party if they claim to be the party of Fair Reflection while not being able to practice the concept.

I'll never forget Robert Wexler's smug demeanor as he proudly stated he hadn't a clue what Fair Reflection meant.

Hillary Clinton Protest Postcards are now Online!

2008-07-11T11:58:00.000-07:00

You can order Hillary Clinton Protest Postcards at AlexLOGIC on Amazon dot com

I believe if thousands upon thousands of these postcards end up at various locations such as the DNC, it can make a difference. The postcards are professionally produced and come with tiered discount pricing.

Other places to mail the postcards to include delegates, superdelegates, politicians, radio, television, and newspaper pundits.

Please DO NOT order these postcards if you are John McCain or Barack Obama supporters or do not plan on resending out the postcards after you receive them.

Hillary Clinton Protest Postcards can be ordered at AlexLOGIC on Amazon dot com

How the DNC Strip Voted the Democratic Nomination to Barack Obama's Favor while undermining Hillary Clinton.

2008-07-03T18:51:00.000-07:00

You may think it's funny, but if someone is willing to put an ad in a newspaper for people with balance issues, than clearly balance issues affect a measureable portion of those who vote.

It is pretty much a given that older people are more likely to have balance issues than younger people (not counting drunken college aged kids too stupid to know they've had enough). While the younger crowd will actually seek out losing their balance while skateboarding, doing bicycle jumps, or just driving around drunk, older people are more cautious and will avoid places in which their balance issue could result in an unfortunate fall.

Did the Caucus State Contests Fairly Reflect people with balance issues?

It was this kind of voter strip mining of the democratic party that in most cases adversely affected Hillary Clinton and greatly benefited Barack Obama. I'll expand on this article tomorrow and provide additional data on strip voting that favored Barack Obama in Nevada, Michigan, North Carolina, and Florida and probably other states as well.

Hillary Clinton Supporters Can Split Their Vote this Fall.

2008-06-27T15:33:00.000-07:00

For those who plan on staying upset over how Hillary Clinton has been swindled out of this years democratic nomination, may I suggest a split the vote concept.

If you decide to vote for John McCain, vote for the Democratic legislators in your district.

If you decide to vote for Barack Obama, vote for the Republican legislators in your district.

The DNC split the Vote in Florida and Michigan, and now you have the opportunity to return the favor this fall.

FAIR REFLECTION HISTOGRAM, Even when HIllary Clinton wins 11 of 12 states, it's 555 delegates for Hillary, 550 delegates for Barack Obama.

2008-06-21T11:24:00.000-07:00

I believe the above Hillary Clinton / Barack Obama histogram is one of three main points that must remain visible over the summer. The other two points are the absence of Fair Reflection in the caucus states (which resulted in an unrepresentative 150-200 delegate swing in Barack Obama's favor), and the third point is the behind the scenes shenanigans involving various media outlets.

These media outlets include an unhealthy association between George Soros, MSNBC, Huffington Post, Media Matters, MoveOn.org, Newsweek, and CNN. It was this group effort that worked their vitrol against Hillary Clinton. My concern is because it involved the media pretending to be news gathers when they were actually agenda driven Obama supporters, they committed fraud.

I believe their deceit may rise to the level of an FBI investigation.

Fair Reflection, Fairness Matters Postcards.

2008-06-16T09:34:00.000-07:00

I've created about 15 postcards with different messages on them. The idea is to mail them to anyone in Washington that you feel needs to be carded. If you like this idea, pricing should be around 99 cents. For 99 cents a postcard that you choose will be mailed to the location you want it mailed to.

I've put five samples up on my five blogs.

Fair Reflection Protest, How to Alert the Democratic National Party that Fair Reflection Matters.

2008-06-09T11:23:00.000-07:00

If we started mailing in small mirrors to the democratic national party, perhaps they will get the message that fair reflection, especially in the caucus state contests, is of utmost importance to those of us who will not vote for Barack Obama because of the cheating that went on in the caucus state contests.

I first heard Harold Ickes use the phrase "Fair Reflection" when he was discussing delegate allocations with Robert Wexler, a Florida Legislator. Wexler stated that since Hillary picked up 19 net delegates from her victories in Pennsylvania and Ohio, she should be grateful for Barack Obama's generosity in letting Hillary Clinton have 19 net delegates from Florida.

Fair Reflection means that wins in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Texas should carry more weight than Barack Obama's victory in the Minnesota Caucus Contest. Barack Obama actually picked up more net delegates from ONE Minnesota Caucus victory than Hillary Clinton picked up by winning in Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania, MIchigan, Indiana, and Nevada. This is called Unfair Reflection.

If you decide to send a mirror into the DNC as a form of protest, please make sure it has hardened plastic around the entire edge of the mirror so that it doesn't cut anybody, and pack the item safely. We want to make sure the DNC looks at themselves each and every time they open a package with a mirror inside.

Fair Reflection must win out or the democratic party will take a long time to heal from their arrogance in ignoring it.

The Great Plains States, Fair Reflection Ignored by the Democratic Party.

2008-06-08T21:36:00.000-07:00

After reading this article please check out the important link updates about Caucus Cheating and the documentary "We Will Not Be Silenced" near the bottom of this article.

Barack Obama won many of his caucus state contests in the Great Plains States and surrounding areas. But the final week of the 2008 democratic campaign raised a huge question mark over those Great Plains States Caucus Contest Victories when Hillary Clinton easily won a South Dakota PRIMARY.

Between the two final contests of Montana and South Dakota, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama basically tied in the popular vote. Once again we have an example in which Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are very close in the overall popular vote, but Barack Obama wins the caucus delegates by a 2-1 margin and Hillary Clinton barely gains a lead in the primary contest delegates.

While some may call this good political strategy, what happened to one person, one vote that democratic party refes to as "Fair Reflection"? Virtually every caucus state that had a poll taken one week or less before their caucus contest revealed Hillary Clinton either winning, or at the worst tied with Barack Obama!

Clearly the 2-1 margin of Victory in the Great Plains Caucus Contests and surrounding areas were NOT a FAIR REFLECTION of the democratic popular vote for the entire region. It looks pretty evident that the two democratic candidates were much much closer in the states that held primaries, with Hillary Clinton holding a strategic lead in 8 of the 10 biggest states, many of which are known as "Swing States."

Only a popular vote primary in all of the caucus contest states will truly reveal who is the stronger candidate, and most likely it would show that Barack Obama is at best tied with Hillary Clinton where previously Barack Obama had a 2-1 caucus delegate lead. But a tie in the caucus contests would reveal Hillary Clinton to be the overall stronger candidate because she has done so well in the primary contests.

If a primary revote were done in all of the caucus states and Hillary Clinton closed the gap from the overly inflated 66% to 33% to a much more realistic 50-50 split, Hillary Clinton would have emerged as the stronger democratic candidate than Barack Obama.

The Democratic Party, the party that claims to believe in Fair Reflection, has chosen to ignore this concept during the 2008 democratic campaign. I believe the the democratic party will regret their lack of fair reflection in 2008. Let me correct that statement, I believe the democratic higher ups who have no remorse over not fairly reflecting the will of the voters in all states will feel the wrath of voters this fall, and hopefully they will be removed from power.

Additional examples of Caucus Contests that reveal a huge disparity to Primary results for the same states can be found here.

The four worst offenders in my opinion are Harry Reid, Howard Dean, Donna Brazille, and Nancy Pelosi. Once they have all been replaced, I plan on returning to the democratic party.

An amazing overview of Caucus and Primary Cheating that occurred during the 2008 democratic presidential race can be found here.

(Important update- July 12, 2010)

And there is this thread on HillBuzz article about We Will Not Be Silenced.

Help keep this thread on GretaWire to the front so more people can learn about We Will Not Be Silenced

Harold Ickes "Fair Reflection" comment misrepresented by the American Media.

2008-06-07T12:42:00.001-07:00

I have had to rerun this article after noticing the american media is trying to camouflauge and change the context under which the phrase "Fair Reflection" was used when Harold Ickes questioned Robert Wexler about its meaning.

I am stunned at the level of deception our own american media is stooping to in an effort to change a pivotal moment in the Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Florida Michigan delegate battle.

Robert Wexler makes a very controversial statement...."What we are saying is that up to the number of 19, which is the maximum amount allowable under the Ausman Petition and under your rules. WE THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN WILL SUPPORT THAT EFFORT, AND WE DO SO, WE DO SO, IN AN EFFORT OF UNITY."

"Why Mr. Ickes, is it a significant concession?"

"Because in the State of Ohio and the State of Pennsylvania, TOGETHER, Senator Clinton WON A TOTAL OF 19 DELEGATES!!!"

"and here we are today offering a resolution that brings Florida voters TOGETHER, that actually amounts to both the victories of Ohio and Pennsylvania! Let us UNIFY, LET US MOVE ON!" -Robert Wexler

(The pro Obama supporters cheer this rampantly arrogant and completely misguided, idiotic reasoning. It is this "reasoning" which also permeates the elitist Obama brainchild to an alarming degree)."

-------------------------------

Commentary by Alessandro Machi about the above statement of Robert Wexler.

Besides Ohio and Pennsylvania, Mr. Wexler could have added Texas, Nevada, and Indiana to his infamous 19 Delegate list. All five states were Hillary Clinton Wins, and all five actually netted Hillary Clinton ONLY 18 delegates more than Barack Obama!

Do you see the narcissism and arrogance, the "mine, mine, mine" style of politicking the Obama camp runs? The Barack Obama camp is actually bragging that the 19 Florida delegates they want to bestow on Hillary Clinton is an incredibly generous offer. The Barack Obama 19 Florida delegate offer is one more than the sum total of delegates that Hillary Clinton gained over Barack Obama in the swing states of Ohio and Pennsylvania, PLUS Texas, Nevada, and Indiana, ALL HILLARY CLINTON VICTORY STATES!

lol, isn't it possible, just possible, that winning a decisive plurality when millions upon millions of voters vote, (also known as "Fair Reflection") is more significant and bankable than the cheating the Obama camp did in the caucus states to pick up a couple of hundred questionable delegates?

"Fair Reflection" is a concept that is completely oblivious to the Barack Obama camp and clearly was not used as a bellweather to limit the amount of cheating that the Barack Obama side was involved in during their caucus campaigning.

A wise leader knows to limit the amount of cheating to just below what will be noticed. lol, Clearly Barack Obama is not a wise leader.

Ickes is stunned into Silence by the bravado of the intellectually bankrupt opposition.

Robert Wexler listens as Harold Ickes asks, "I gather that you agree with the concept of fair reflection?"

Mr. Wexler looks confused, but smugly confident nonetheless since he doesn't fear that which he cannot comprehend. The pro Obama side cheers on Mr. Wexler as if to say "You may not know what "Fair Reflection means", but we don't either so it must not matter".

In a signature moment that defines the Obama campaign motto of "If we don't understand you, then you don't make sense", Mr. Wexler mockingly and cockily presumes that not only does he not know what fair reflection is, it just doesn't matter to him nor the Obama side.

Mr. Ickes, realizing that he is up against pure bravado backed by youthful inexperience, does not attempt to educate the defiantly uneducatable. This is what the real democratic party is up against. Youthful arrogance that can't comprehend it was Bill Clinton's administration that laid the foundation for their own parents being able to save money during the 90's so they could go to college. Apparently that college education has been used to hate Hillary Clinton, and to cheat in the caucus state voting. wow.

Hillary Clinton is also up against a sordid duo of Billionaire George Soros and secret love interest Arianna Huffington and the politics of hating those who stay married, competently raise a child, and show their love and respect for each other through their mutual teamwork in their political careers. The democratic party is being done in by ilicit lovers who have fricasseed a successful, intelligent, married woman. Double wow.

FAIR-REFLECTION.COM is now Online!

2008-06-06T22:08:00.000-07:00

Welcome to Fair Reflection blog. This blog will be a compilation of all the violations of Fair Reflection that the democratic party has been complicent in during the 2008 democratic presidential election.